There are renewed calls for landlords to test for the residue of a potent drug inside their properties after a New South Wales tenant became ill and was forced to abandon her possessions.
- NSW renter says she fell ill, had to discard her possessions due to ice contamination
- Detection firm says scores of properties in the area tested positive for ice residue
- Real estate industry “aware of problem”, but wary of mandatory tests
Veronica Rawlinson had been experiencing poor health for several months before requesting the four-bedroom home she was leasing in Nowra be swabbed for traces of methamphetamine, or the drug ice.
“My energy was really low and then I broke out in a skin rash on my shoulder and my arm,” Ms Rawlinson said.
“My doctor did biopsies and it all came back inconclusive, so I contacted a company that does meth testing and the house came back positive.
“Everything changed after that, I left the property with two cats and a handbag because all of my belongings were contaminated and now have to be triple wrapped in plastic and buried in the ground at the tip,” Ms Rawlinson said.
Ms Rawlinson said she is now pursuing compensation through the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal.
“We’ve been in the tribunal three times now and haven’t had any sort of final solution because the law isn’t up to date,” Ms Rawlinson said.
SCORES OF POSITIVE TESTS
According to Megan Liddicoat from Meth Detection Australia, every property the company has swabbed on the South Coast has tested positive for residue from the drug ice.
“I haven’t actually tested something in the South Coast area that isn’t positive,” Ms Liddicoat said.
“That’s 40 homes that have tested positive.”
A test costs around $250 and is conducted similarly to a litmus test, where a surface is swabbed to reveal whether traces of the chemical are present before a larger sample is sent to a lab for testing.
“I only started this business because I live locally, my family live locally and I’m going to have grandchildren living locally,” Ms Liddicoat said.
“I don’t think landlords know about the risk that they’ve got, they don’t understand, or it’s not been explained to them.
“I don’t want my family to suffer the effects of this.”
SERIOUS HEALTH CONSEQUENCES
Dr Jackie Wright, an Adjunct Researcher at Flinders University, has been studying the impacts and risks of second-hand exposure to methamphetamine.
“From both manufacture and use, those drug residues deposit and stick to all of the hard surfaces in the property,” Dr Wright said.
“But they also penetrate all the soft things, so furnishings, carpets and curtains.
“The residue then hangs around for years which means we can actually come into contact with them and absorb that drug into our body.”
Dr Wright said the drug can have serious consequences on health and can alter behaviour in children.
“So whenever you’re in the house, you’re exposed and it’s getting in your body,” she said.
“What we’re seeing is effects such as headaches, persistent coughs, increased susceptibility to coughs, colds and infections, eye irritations, skin rashes, trouble sleeping for kids, and vivid dreams.
“We also find some of the kids have behavioural changes, they’re inattentive or some kids become more aggressive in those particular properties.”
INDUSTRY SEEKS GUIDANCE, BACKS AWAY FROM MANDATORY TESTS
Industry representatives are acknowledging the issue but backing away from advocating for mandatory screening of rental properties.
“I think before we go down that path we have to actually understand if it does pose a genuine risk,” NSW Real Estate Institute CEO Tim McKibbin said.
“We are aware that methamphetamine is a problem within properties but what we don’t know is the extent of the problem.”
Mr McKibbin likened the issue to asbestos and called for government assistance in providing guidance around best practice when residue from methamphetamine was detected inside a property.
“This is another example of where government is not prepared to give any genuine assistance to real estate agents who have the problem of trying to determine a substance or an activity is posing a danger,” Mr McKibbin said.
“We’ve sought research out of New Zealand, we’ve written to the Chief Scientist in Australia and we’ve written to the Chief Medical Officer and the request has now gone off to a committee.
“It’s a pass the parcel exercise where no body wants to take ownership of it, nobody wants to give guidance on it because it could be the case that they would then have to accept some sort of liability for it.”
According to a report released by New Zealand’s Chief Scientist passive, third-hand exposure to the drug ice can arise through residing in a dwelling previously used as a lab or where a significant amount of the drug has been smoked.
The report concluded that there was no published data relating to the health risks of living in a house where methamphetamine had previously only been smoked.
The document recommended that screening for the drug be considered where meth lab activity or very heavy use was suspected.